4 ms·
> And why[while?] one might argue about the "better" This is my point. Python's philosophy isn't "bad" in a universal sense (let alone broken). It's just that
by y7 10y ago
> And why[while?] one might argue about the "better"
This is my point. Python's philosophy isn't "bad" in a universal sense (let alone broken). It's just that the author has a different philosophy for programming languages himself. And I find it short-sighted to regard other philosophies as "bad" or "flawed", simply because they do not match your own.
- coldtea 10y agoYes, I meant to write "while" (my comments are usually hastily written while waiting some build to finish and full of typos). >And I find it short-sighted to regard other philosophies as "bad" or "flawed", simply because they do not match your own. Sure, but isn't a "all philosophies are equal" also misleading? Some philosophies can be inherently worse than one's own.