I don't think hacknat disagrees with you, and I certainly don't. What I read is that what we call "property rights" is a fairly new idea, and we shouldn't trea

I don't think hacknat disagrees with you, and I certainly don't. What I read is that what we call "property rights" is a fairly new idea, and we shouldn't treat it as "natural" or as a fundamental law of the universe as some do. For the record, I'm in full agreement that excessive restriction on property and capital has costs. Creating and maintaining the idea of "private property" has costs too.