The point I'm making is, Defender is no better than these AV companies as it fails detection tests just as much as they do, if not more. romanovcode implied th

The point I'm making is, Defender is no better than these AV companies as it fails detection tests just as much as they do, if not more. romanovcode implied that because AV tests are frequently sponsored by AV companies, that would somehow negate Defender's consistently poor results (which would make no sense, as it has poor results pretty much universally across different tests).