3 ms·
> I wonder if anyone has estimated the impact of "simple" engineering changes on the progress of electric cars. Many years ago, I was browsing through an old H
by mschaef 10y ago
> I wonder if anyone has estimated the impact of "simple" engineering changes on the progress of electric cars.
Many years ago, I was browsing through an old Hot Rodding guide to Harley Davidson motorcycles. (Don't ask why.) One line from the book that made a lasting impression was a comment to the effect that real progress was more likely to be found in one hundred 1% improvements than one 100% improvement.
As a practitioner and observer of engineering, this really resonates as something with a lot of truth. Even for seemingly transformative changes, they're backed with a long series of incremental refinements until they're actually useful. T
- RmDen 10y agosounds a lot like Kaizen
- jp555 10y agoCompounded growth is a powerful thing. 1% compounded 100 times = 270.48, which is way better than 100%! And it gets even better the more steps you go: 1% x 150 = 444.84 1% x 200 = 731.6 People lament the fact that batteries "only get better about 5% per year", but compounding that means they double in performance every ~14 years!