> That's why we so often see automated systems backed by people, as we don't have automation that can respond as dynamically as a person. I imagine there's spe

> That's why we so often see automated systems backed by people, as we don't have automation that can respond as dynamically as a person. I imagine there's specialized training involved to make sure that the person monitoring the machine understands the nature of how the machine operates in order to service it and know when it's making mistakes. I wonder if the people monitoring the machines are the same ones that are being automated out of jobs or if it's an entirely different skill set?