3 ms·
The parent commenter finds it hilarious because, in their words, "land shouldn't be owned by anyone." Your family owning multiple plots of land is diametrically
by dsacco 10y ago
The parent commenter finds it hilarious because, in their words, "land shouldn't be owned by anyone." Your family owning multiple plots of land is diametrically opposed to that world view. I foresee a very unproductive ideological argument about capitalism and property rights ensuing.
- caminante 10y agoDefinitions matter too. "Privilege" has lost much of its meaning [0] if "living in multiple places" is acceptable criteria. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privilege_(social_inequality) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privilege_(social_inequality)
- tabeth 10y agoWhy link to the Wikipedia page and not to an actual definition? https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/privilege https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/privilege
- caminante 10y agoWhy link to the Wikipedia page and not to an actual definition? Your claim is provably false. The Wikipedia entry offers "an actual definition." Also, the Wikipedia entry is based on numerous references and published literature supporting the definition.
- throwanem 10y agoThat's not the definition of the word. It's a description of the word's use as a term of art in a very specific sociological and political theory which its adherents would like very much for everyone to assume is the only one which correctly describes reality.