4 ms·

I can understand him wanting to make sure land ownership claims are settled. On the otherhand him taking about how he is against walls then litterly building o

by bruceb 10y ago

I can understand him wanting to make sure land ownership claims are settled. On the otherhand him taking about how he is against walls then litterly building one in Hawaii that blocks people's view of the water is the height of hypocrisy.

iaw 10y ago
Not wanting the potential for easements on your property in the future : perfectly sensible. Denying access to formerly communal areas when you aren't going to be there : kinda crappy.
yunolisten 10y ago
> how he is against walls then litterly building one 1 mile, long, 6 feet tall?
- loafa 10y ago
  A wall one mile long to protect one guy from trespassers is reasonable but a wall two thousand miles long to protect 250 million people is ridiculous, according to Zuck.
  - criddell 10y ago
    I think calling people traversing the property tresspasser is part of the problem.
general_ai 10y ago
Do as I say, not as I do. I bet he doesn't even see the irony -- too many sycophants around telling him how awesome he is.
debt 10y ago
It is odd that he would even put himself in this situation. I guess his PR people have deemed this subject to fly mostly under the radar of most people.
CaptSpify 10y ago
What do you mean by "he is against walls"?
- bruceb 10y ago
  http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/06/mark-zuckerberg-wall-hawaii http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/06/mark-zuckerberg-wall-...