Oh I agree but if he's able to put up some documentation/proof that his claims are valid than I'm OK with how and by whom it's delivered. But maybe that's too

Oh I agree but if he's able to put up some documentation/proof that his claims are valid than I'm OK with how and by whom it's delivered. But maybe that's too much to hope and he's just slinging mud. Hard to tell without digging into the details but the article does say this: Not all his claims are backed up, explained, or accurate. But the site still offers an embarrassing catalogue of bad deeds, which Shkreli told STAT he would continually update. I'm hoping Ars wouldn't have published the article at all unless they put at least some stock in his claims.