3 ms·
But that's not going to work in practice - there are many skilled C++ devs and C++ has many ingrained legacy issues which another systems programming language c
by rubber_duck 10y ago
But that's not going to work in practice - there are many skilled C++ devs and C++ has many ingrained legacy issues which another systems programming language could solve - but the bridge between that language and C++ must exist for this to happen. Like in the post, OP is a competent programmer - he can solve his problem in C++ - why would he invest months in to Rust to do the same thing ? If your answer is safety then OK that will matter to some but a lot of people don't care enough about it to pay the cost of switching.
- the_af 10y agoSafety and correctness are big deals. I get that for many people they aren't a high priority. Such is life. If someone thinks they won't gain anything by going from C++ to Rust, then no effort to learn it will be worth it. Obviously the Rust devs think there is a benefit.