2 ms·
Id say the jury is out on that one. TV is a shared experience, VR is not. Also VR is interactive while TV is largely passive. What can be interesting is the
by digi_owl 10y ago
Id say the jury is out on that one.
TV is a shared experience, VR is not.
Also VR is interactive while TV is largely passive.
What can be interesting is the likes of VR chatrooms/lounges.
- abakker 10y agoVR doesn't necessarily need to be active. Passive VR might be a great way to start, especially if it can display the content already created for 3d TVs. I think the jury is still out on the best VR control interfaces when you are actually engaged with the content. I'd love to see Passive VR content and active VR content develop side-by-side like Movies and Videogames did.