4 ms·
This is offset in part by reducing or eliminating transportation costs and intermediation. I was reading an interesting article about the farmer's market in my
by GFischer 10y ago
This is offset in part by reducing or eliminating transportation costs and intermediation.
I was reading an interesting article about the farmer's market in my country, production is actually not the largest cost, it's less than half of the actual sale price.
See for example:
http://capreform.eu/farmers-share-of-food-chain-value-added/ http://capreform.eu/farmers-share-of-food-chain-value-added/
(spanish) the article I was reading: http://www.cnfr.org.uy/uploads/files/Manual_de_comercializacin_de_frutas_y_hortalizas_frescas.pdf http://www.cnfr.org.uy/uploads/files/Manual_de_comercializac...
- lambdadmitry 10y agoEven if it's possible to squeeze three times more money for the actual plant growing, I'm not sure it will make a dent on the difference. From the energy perspective: highest possible solar cell efficiency is around 30%, which means just this particular step in the chain will already eliminate the upside of local produce. We still have to account for batteries, LEDs, transmission lines, heating or cooling of the farm, and pumping water and nutrients around. The numbers just don't add up for "large-scale" staple crops like wheat or soy.