33 ms·
Seems to be around 6 times more expensive than S3 for my usage (<1TB, EU Standard - Infrequent Access is $0.0125/GB vs $0.08/GB). Of course, you can’t rsync to
by dan1234 10y ago
Seems to be around 6 times more expensive than S3 for my usage (<1TB, EU Standard - Infrequent Access is $0.0125/GB vs $0.08/GB).
Of course, you can’t rsync to S3 so I’m handling backups with duplicity and using S3 as the storage target.
- throwawayish 10y agoAn important point to note is that esp. with S3 infrequent access or Glacier there are additional costs associated with restoring, which can be quite high. With S3/Glacier one needs to spend a bit of time to even figure out how much a restore would cost.
- dan1234 10y agoYes, the data retrieval fee for infrequent access is $0.01/GB so a 1TB restore would cost me $10. Thankfully I’ve not had to perform a complete restore, though I do regular test restores of a part of the backup just to make sure it’s all still working. Edit: It’s actually $100 (as transfer from S3->Internet adds $0.09/GB)