9 ms·
I love browser integration but am not willing to go to lastpass, therefore have to stay with the ugly, but well functioning .NET keepass2 client on desktop and
by vanous 10y ago
I love browser integration but am not willing to go to lastpass, therefore have to stay with the ugly, but well functioning .NET keepass2 client on desktop and with the nice keepass2android.
> From the text it looks like one of the selling points is integration with apps like browsers so you don't have to copy/paste passwords, as with KeePassX.
Can you provide source please? thank you.
This [1] says the opposite: (quoting from the github issue):
"I removed the milestone for now since we are not sure if we actually want our users to expose their passwords over a network protocol with questionable security record. The security of both KeePassHTTP and KeePassRPC is doubtable and in their current state we would prefer not to have them as part of the main KeePassXC product.
This doesn't mean KeePassXC will never support it, it only means that at the moment we don't have immediate plans and an implementation needs further discussion."
[1] https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc/issues/88#issuecomment-272626610 https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc/issues/88#issuec...
- Nullabillity 10y agoApparently it does support KeePassHTTP, if you recompile it with a special flag: https://keepassxreboot.github.io/project https://keepassxreboot.github.io/project
- vanous 10y agoYes, i just found it, thanks! Unfortunately, the on Firefox side, i can only use PassIFox extension, which has been too barebone to fit my needs. KeeFox has been excellent - especially if you have multiple accounts associated with single domain or even subdomains. What i use a lot is to open up a website with particular credentials (search in KeeFox by Ctrl-1) or to generate passwords (Ctrl-4) (good if you are the one making logins for other people).
- ComodoHacker 10y ago>the ugly, but well functioning .NET keepass2 What's ugly about it, besides (I guess) .NET part?
- Nullabillity 10y agoMono's WinForms shim is... less than stellar, sadly. Occasionally, text goes some unreadable colour. And it crashes when I click while holding down Super. And it only follows the GTK colour scheme sometimes; enabling night mode ended up with a beautiful mix of black-on-black-with-white-stripes. Oh, and widgets like buttons look like a poor man's copy of Windows 95. Though, to be fair, I now seem to be unable to trigger the above bugs in the latest build, so I guess it's no longer quite as much of an issue.
- vanous 10y ago>Occasionally, text goes some unreadable colour. And it crashes when I click while holding down Super. And it only follows the GTK colour scheme sometimes; enabling night mode ended up with a beautiful mix of black-on-black-with-white-stripes. Yes, all of the above. Plus having several hundreds of mono libs installed for just one app. That app runs 100% of time, but still...