>The openness of Wikipedia is the outworking of a philosophy that truth, when crowdsourced, is just as strong — if not stronger — than when managed by a select

>The openness of Wikipedia is the outworking of a philosophy that truth, when crowdsourced, is just as strong — if not stronger — than when managed by a select few. Unfortunately Wikipedia isn't like this in practice. There are several articles written in a quite biased way, with biased references, which are then locked at various thresholds. Wikipedia, just as the democracy it relies on, is no truth machine.