Interesting point. Like you, I'm also skeptical of the ability of this tool to accurately detect useful research claims/results, and surface them to the right

Interesting point. Like you, I'm also skeptical of the ability of this tool to accurately detect useful research claims/results, and surface them to the right user. It's easy these days to claim "Deep learning" and "Machine intelligence" and get significant funding. If MarkZ helped oversee the due diligence of this company (and I don't know how involved he is, since this is Chan's initiative) then they probably were evaluated very thoroughly, given Mark's recent interest in AI.