> but I don't think this is good evidence for ohstopitu being underpaid That's a fair enough point. My original post was just to point out that the answer to

> but I don't think this is good evidence for ohstopitu being underpaid That's a fair enough point. My original post was just to point out that the answer to ohstopitu's original question is not some great mystery, and all they need to do is answer the question I posed back, because it's exactly the same answer to both questions.