4 ms·
Heads up poker is precisely about equilibrium. Your straddle reference is also irrelevant, this is not live multiway poker. "Tricking an opponent into thinking
by hunl 10y ago
Heads up poker is precisely about equilibrium. Your straddle reference is also irrelevant, this is not live multiway poker.
"Tricking an opponent into thinking it has metaphorically thrown rock" extrapolated into a poker example would be betting larger/smaller, calling more/less, folding more/less than is optimal in a given scenario in the hope that your opponent makes a (bigger) mistake. You're simply hoping he makes more errors than you, the AI instead choses to just make zero mistakes and let the opponents do the rest. You can see this in action for yourself in Heads up limit holdem by playing Cepheus (http://poker-play.srv.ualberta.ca http://poker-play.srv.ualberta.ca)
- xapata 10y agoYou're still thinking one hand at a time. It may be possible to confuse the opponent into permanently shifting strategy. I agree that would not happen if two equilibrium-seeking computers played each other. Since the human strategy is unknown, it is possible that equilibrium may not exist or be optimal. Even if it's two computers, if one of the computers has the possibility of choosing a non-equilibrium strategy, then again the optimal strategy may not be to seek equilibrium.