3 ms·
That site, the linked paper, the vague 'membership' definition, is complete trash.
by snoman 10y ago
That site, the linked paper, the vague 'membership' definition, is complete trash.
- nickysielicki 10y ago> complete trash That's not constructive at all. This kind of response is against HN guidelines. This group/site entirely consists of university professors, all of whom are named on the site [1]. The basis for post I linked to was a paper that was published in Cambridge's Behavioral and Brain Sciences journal [2], and was written by one of the authors. You're entitled to disagree with it, but the burden of proof is on you. [1]: http://heterodoxacademy.org/about-us/ http://heterodoxacademy.org/about-us/ [2]: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences/article/div-classtitlepolitical-diversity-will-improve-social-psychological-sciencea-hrefen01-ref-typefnspan-classsup1spanadiv/A54AD4878AED1AFC8BA6AF54A890149F https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain...