4 ms·
Because it goes against the leftist portrayal of Trump as being racist. So they remain silent.
by devereaux 10y ago
Because it goes against the leftist portrayal of Trump as being racist. So they remain silent.
- croon 10y agoOr that they are of the acceptable echelon of immigrants. I wish I was joking.
- woofyman 10y agoI don't know about the others, but Mr Pai was born in Buffalo NY. Edit: Nikki Haley isn't an immigrant either.
- Apocryphon 10y agoAnd Judge Gonzalo Curiel was born in Indiana. In the U.S., people who are of clear immigrant ancestry are often lumped in with first generation immigrants in these controversies. To pretend otherwise is to feign ignorance.
- woofyman 10y agoI'm a second generation Jew. >To pretend otherwise is to feign ignorance. I wasn't pretending otherwise. You're making a big assumption about my intent. Edit: Trumps comments about the judge were overt racism.
- Apocryphon 10y agoI didn't mean to attack you specifically, but a lot of times these debates split fine hairs over truisms like "Mexican is not a race", "Islam is not a race", etc., as if bigotry is always well-informed on taxonomy and anthropology. So while pointing out conservative Indian-Americans such as Haley, Pai, Jindal, Ponnuru, were born in the U.S. is true, it's incidental to the main issues of how non-white populations are perceived/treated in this country.
- woofyman 10y ago>it's incidental to the main issues of how non-white populations are perceived/treated in this country. I totally agree.
- bluthru 10y ago>Edit: Trumps comments about the judge were overt racism. How were those comments any different than the comments about the white male judge in the Stanford swimmer sexual assault case? Or how about comments regarding the racial makeup of a jury? The fact is that humans do bring personal biases into the legal system. It doesn't seem like the political press is holding everyone to the same standards.
- sft 10y agoHow is it even possible to be a 2nd generation kike? Did your parents convert?
- dandersh 10y agoActually it does not contradict the absolutely correct portrayal of him as a racist. 1. He did not speak of India and Indians in the same way he did Mexico and Mexicans, of which was textbook racism, i.e. generalizing negative stereotypes based on ethnicity, promotion of conspiracy theories, etc. 2. Racism applies to attitudes/beliefs towards individual ethnicities, not all of them together. 3. Being cordial/friendly to individual members does not trump (pun intended) discriminatory attitudes towards the race as a whole. "I can't be a racist, I have a black friend!"
- LyndsySimon 10y ago> way he did Mexico and Mexicans Cite? I've heard him speak about illegal Mexican immigrants, but that's not the same thing. I'm the first to admit I've not heard everything he's said, though. He's said a lot.