3 ms·
You already know they're dang fast :P Version B was noticeably slower for me on desktop, but still 100% okay in my book. Version A was near-instant. My eye cau
by err4nt 10y ago
You already know they're dang fast :P
Version B was noticeably slower for me on desktop, but still 100% okay in my book. Version A was near-instant. My eye caught that the image didn't magically appear fully loaded, but after a split second loading was complete and the page (and layout) look great!
- interfacesketch 10y agoThanks for trying out these test pages! When I created them, I tried loading them in different locations on my phone. Surprisingly, even in busy city-centre locations (using 3G), the pages weren't always loading instantly - but they were fairly fast, enough to feel usable.