3 ms·
They seem to own the domain in question, so that could've been validated according to spec. The only thing that's weird in that certificate would be the organiz
by pfg 10y ago
They seem to own the domain in question, so that could've been validated according to spec. The only thing that's weird in that certificate would be the organizationalUnitName being "Test"; I don't think that would be a Baseline Requirements violation as such. They only require that the OU field be not misleading (i.e. you can't use a trademark you do not own as your OU, etc.)