5 ms·
> Overly terse named types and keywords that don't communicate their purpose, like Vec and Cell. I completely agree with this. This type of naming convention s
by alimbada 10y ago
> Overly terse named types and keywords that don't communicate their purpose, like Vec and Cell.
I completely agree with this. This type of naming convention shouldn't even be a remote possibility in this day and age. I find it extremely difficult to read coming from mainly a C# and Java background.
- eptcyka 10y agoWere you expecting the same keywords for the same things in a different language? The original Rust designers had a goal to have all keywords be under 5 characters in length to try and make the language as small as possible. I do not think that this is an issue. But to each his own, I guess.