3 ms·
Somewhat, yes. It seems that graphite is a somewhat more relaxed state than carbon's diamond crystal allotrope. Both burn, and can be vaporized with LOX/acetyl
by truncheon 10y ago
Somewhat, yes. It seems that graphite is a somewhat more relaxed state than carbon's diamond crystal allotrope.
Both burn, and can be vaporized with LOX/acetyline torches:
http://www.popsci.com/sites/popsci.com/files/styles/medium_1x_/public/import/2013/images/2009/08/diamond3.jpg http://www.popsci.com/sites/popsci.com/files/styles/medium_1...
But apparently, over long periods of time, and unless coerced, carbon prefers to be graphite and so, diamonds can decay as such. [0]
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Material_properties_of_diamond#Thermal_stability https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Material_properties_of_diamond...
Hence why graphite is generally more plentiful than diamonds.
- SixSigma 10y agoCoal isn't graphite though. And you're talking about burning, not storage. Coal produces lots of dust and debris. I'm sure diamond would produce some dust at volumes. https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-coal-and-graphite https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-coal-an... Anyway, it's fantasy because I'm fairly confident we're not going to turn CO2 into mountains of diamonds in my lifetime!