>Those things weren't created primarily to give people work They absolutely were. They were created under the auspices of the Public Works Administration (ori

>Those things weren't created primarily to give people work They absolutely were. They were created under the auspices of the Public Works Administration (originally Federal Emergency Administration of Public Works) - part of the 1933 New Deal: https://www.archives.gov/research/guide-fed-records/groups/135.html https://www.archives.gov/research/guide-fed-records/groups/1... "Functions: Administered a comprehensive public works program to promote and stabilize employment." >If no one needs to commute to work in Manhattan, then there is no need for a Lincoln Tunnel. If no one has business meetings or disposable income for leisure travel, then LAX and LaGuardia would be idiotic. That does not change the fact that these infrastructure works were created primarily to give the unemployed jobs and wouldn't have existed without it. >We do see this kind of stuff - huge infrastructure projects with no users - in China. Some of the infrastructure is like that but most has enough users to justify its existence. Their infrastructure-building binge isn't crazy. Our intentional lack of infrastructural improvement (which is entirely about artificially throttling employment and wage growth) is crazy.