I really hate to get into a debate about semantics, but that is not what "able" means. =) I think I understand your position better now, though. It's not so mu

I really hate to get into a debate about semantics, but that is not what "able" means. =) I think I understand your position better now, though. It's not so much about whether voters can vote themselves more money - it's about whether they have the incentive to. I don't agree, because I think shared interest in the stability of the system would be a strong opposing force, but I can see where you're coming from.