The RF is pretty good looking, though the newer generations tend to have "evil reptilian eyes"-type [1] headlights and bodies with a kind of blunt chunkiness th

The RF is pretty good looking, though the newer generations tend to have "evil reptilian eyes"-type [1] headlights and bodies with a kind of blunt chunkiness that a lot of modern cars have. I assume the intention is to impart a sense of muscularity, but to me that just looks misguided and embarrassingly macho, like the car equivalent of body building. I like the round front of the version shown in this 2012 article, was it ever made? [2] The RF's hood has those muscular side ridges which I think look terrible. Edit: The 2005 model has a round front like that [3], and is less evil. (Agreed about the rest. I don't really know cars, so before I commented I just googled the various Miata generations and seem to have misread Wikipedia.) [1] http://blog.caranddriver.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/2016-Mazda-MX-5-Miata-PLACEMENT.jpg http://blog.caranddriver.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/2016... [2] http://www.autoevolution.com/news/next-gen-mazda-miata-loses-weight-to-gain-appeal-36326.html http://www.autoevolution.com/news/next-gen-mazda-miata-loses... [3] http://www.moibbk.com/images/mazda-mx5-miata-black-3.jpg http://www.moibbk.com/images/mazda-mx5-miata-black-3.jpg