3 ms·
When we get to the point where two tools have legitimate, reasonable tradeoffs, then I agree with you. However, your example isn't a good one because Subversio
by lincolnq 16y ago
When we get to the point where two tools have legitimate, reasonable tradeoffs, then I agree with you.
However, your example isn't a good one because Subversion has serious deficiencies and Git works perfectly well in a centralized model. (Just "bless" one repo on a server and have everyone push to it.) I can't think of a single use-case where Subversion is a preferred way to solve the version control problem.
- ivenkys 16y ago"I can't think of a single use-case where Subversion is a preferred way to solve the version control problem". Developer expertise. My point is not that Subversion is a better VCS than git , it is not. I am a big fan of git and will use it everywhere i can but i don;t get to make the decision to choose the "right" VCS every time , sometimes you end up in places where there are factors other than technical merit at play. However, i think we are discussing a point orthogonal to the main topic at hand.