This is an interesting article about Haskell because it does concede that haskell might not be the best language for everything and other languages might be use

This is an interesting article about Haskell because it does concede that haskell might not be the best language for everything and other languages might be useful for certain kinds of apps though not exactly, the actual claim was that haskell was not superior enough to make learning it worthwhile for crud apps. The big disconnect between fp/haskell devotees and other programmers is that everyone else doesn't consider it self evident that haskell or fp is better and the haskell and fp group does a terrible job explaining why they are better paradigms without making assumptions like 'all side effects are bad in all circumstances' or 'imperative programing is always worse way to impliment algorithms' without justifying them empirically and saying your paradim is better without justifying it empirically.