4 ms·

Not sure where you are getting that 50mil is all it takes number. Sf spends much more than that right now. I believe the cities cost per unit is more then 500k

Not sure where you are getting that 50mil is all it takes number. Sf spends much more than that right now. I believe the cities cost per unit is more then 500k. 50mil of housing in sf would barely make a dent. Now 50mil in Mississippi would go a long way. Which is why I hope this becomes a national issue where we can use money from sf and use it to address the issue in cheaper places. It also might help the cheaper places economies.

state_less 10y ago
$50M for a marked improvement, independent of current spend. Buy houses, bottom floor public baths/shower and upper floors house 10-100x more people than low density housing. Keep at it and you'll see a difference. Was thinking ~3M for property and not sure what the construction crew wants, maybe $2-3M for 30 units (think dorm style, shared bathroom per floor housing) Hotspots get 14 day max stay, inland you stay till u you find another place. Would agree, a sister city with comparable warm weather and you might persuade people to live in other warm areas like Mississippi. Phone makes elaborating challenging , sorry about any confusion.