3 ms·
I don't know about that. I'm sure $20 is too much for some people, but in the United States, at least, $20 isn't much compared to the other costs of accessing
by jlarocco 10y ago
I don't know about that. I'm sure $20 is too much for some people, but in the United States, at least, $20 isn't much compared to the other costs of accessing the web. It's very easy for a DSL, cable, or mobile contract to cost $50-150 a month already.
- daveFNbuck 10y ago$20/month for each of the top 20 sites you use is $400/month.
- cwyers 10y agoHe's saying $20 per service, though. The way to make the economics work is the same way the economics of cable TV work - bundling.
- jlarocco 10y agoOh, sorry, I misread. $20 per month per service seems like a ridiculously huge jump for services that are currently "free with advertising," though. Surely nobody is making $20 per user per month with advertising. At $20 a month per service the bigger problem would be people like me who can afford it just fine but don't think most services provide nearly that much value.