4 ms·
Campaigned? I think you meant "published leaked documents without taking a side", but whatever, keep on pretending HRC wasnt just a more presentable version of
by fixxer 10y ago
Campaigned? I think you meant "published leaked documents without taking a side", but whatever, keep on pretending HRC wasnt just a more presentable version of vile.
- fffffffooop 10y agoIf you read WikiLeaks' Twitter posts from September and October, you'll see that they definitely took a side in the election.
- uiri 10y agoI think your point would be stronger if your comment included a few links to the tweets in question.
- fffffffooop 10y agoTwitter's mobile interface really isn't made for looking at tweets from months ago. If I accidentally tap on a tweet and click back, I'm brought back to today's tweets. Here's a blog post where Assange days Hillary Clinton shouldn't be President: https://wikileaks.org/hillary-war/ https://wikileaks.org/hillary-war/
- fffffffooop 10y agoI can't manage to copy links to individual posts without losing my place in the timeline, but there were a number of retweets of non-WikiLeaks related posts about Clinton. They also retweeted this tweet from when Clinton appeared with Pussy Riot in 2014: https://mobile.twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/452130729691201536 https://mobile.twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/45213072969... There's nothing wrong with WikiLeaks supporting a candidate in the election. I do think it's wrong to pretend they're neutral or unbiased.