3 ms·
I can't see why any free software user would consider it unreasonable to charge for delivery of a service as long as the source code for the service is freely a
by slgeorge 10y ago
I can't see why any free software user would consider it unreasonable to charge for delivery of a service as long as the source code for the service is freely available. There's nothing in the FSF / OSI that says anyone is entitled to free operation of software!
There are consumer orientated services like Newsblur (http://newsblur.com http://newsblur.com) that do this. There are business orientated services such as SugarCRM (https://www.sugarcrm.com/ https://www.sugarcrm.com/) that do this.
SaaS is the likely saviour of "commercial" open source.
That said - yes users are unreasonable! All users, all the time. Whether it's open source or otherwise. Unfortunately, lots of open source users think the giving up of their time to report a problem means it should be solved, and they can't do it. The only thing I can offer is that it tells you how important what you created has become to them - think of it as a reverse compliment!
- icebraining 10y agoThere's a common belief among regular people (not actual knowledgeable of the philosophies behind the concepts) that "open source" means everything is free. As a company which sells hosting and development based on an open source project, we see this all the time. That's why we generally avoid mentioning "open source" at all in our marketing (as does Newsblur and SugarCRM, from what I can see).