4 ms·
I don't see where this argument is coming from. There's no reason why self-driving cars can't be as or more capable at interacting with cyclists than human-driv
by davmre 10y ago
I don't see where this argument is coming from. There's no reason why self-driving cars can't be as or more capable at interacting with cyclists than human-driven cars.
Even if issues with self-driving cars did require new regulation, there's no reason that regulation should favor the cars. Cities and their streets are managed by democratically elected governments. If people like cycling -- and many of us do -- then we can construct the regulatory and physical infrastructure to support it.
- mc32 10y agoIt's not that it favor cars, but that it favor predictability and thus order and as a result fewer collisions meaning more healthy people! note: I'd be glad to register and pay for a bike license if that means more dedicated lanes for cycling --so long as scofflaws get ticketed.