3 ms·
I think that's included as an example, the actual line reads: > Abusive use of a domain is described as an illegal, disruptive, malicious, or fraudulent action
by jbob2000 10y ago
I think that's included as an example, the actual line reads:
> Abusive use of a domain is described as an illegal, disruptive, malicious, or fraudulent action
and includes, without limitation, the following
So the real rule is not to defame anyone of sufficient public standing (ie. someone like Justin Beiber or Oprah Winfrey. Daniel Negari is the CEO of the company, so of course him too)
- Finnucane 10y agoPerhaps that's the intent, but the actual wording suggests specifically those individuals. Also, since he has claims on .security and .theatre, why doesn't he go for the obvious and add .securitytheatre?
- phreenet 10y agoI disagree, this states 'the following' then list bullets so it should be > Abusive use of a domain is described as an illegal, disruptive, malicious, or fraudulent action and includes, without limitation, illegal, malicious and fraudulent defamation of Oprah Winfrey, Daniel Negari, or Justin Bieber.