3 ms·
Of course that is the solution. The question is how? To be specific, what actually should we educate the population? We should differentiate knowledge from int
by hzhou321 10y ago
Of course that is the solution. The question is how? To be specific, what actually should we educate the population?
We should differentiate knowledge from intelligence or wisdom. Knowledge can be fake, misleading, or contradictory. We have more knowledge and access of information than medieval age typical Joe, but do we have more intelligence or wisdom?
To make the comparison easier, do we have more intelligence and wisdom than Plato (whom I am certain that we possess more knowledge)?
- theseadroid 10y agoThis is a large topic and I've been thinking for a while. In essence, there are 2 major things we need to educate more. 1. Science. To the point that average joe understands that the prediction of climate change is concluded from the same scientific methods that helped us finding cures for diseases, inventing computers, and sending people to the moon. Science is not always perfect the same as we dont always have perfect cure for some diseases at the moment. But that is the best we can do for now, and it's the work of many experts over many years. So it is logical to either believe it or contribute to it scientifically, financially, auditing-wise, or something else. After all we believe in scientists not because that they have the title, but because we believe in scientific methods, in scientific approach. 2. Social science. Pure science is about causality. Social science can teach us value, what is good, what is bad, and happiness. Then we can discuss whether not acting upon climate change will make you more happy or less happy.
- sjg007 10y agoNever going to happen in the us of a..