4 ms·
Do you have any evidence it is solar and wind and not natural gas that have been undercutting coal?
by merpnderp 10y ago
Do you have any evidence it is solar and wind and not natural gas that have been undercutting coal?
- mulletbum 10y agoThere is some stuff out there. Check out this article http://bfy.tw/9azA http://bfy.tw/9azA
- KirinDave 10y agoThis is an odd request. Everything is undercutting coal. Coal has always been a rather expensive and dangerous technology, it's just that it's plentiful and in the land rights of Western powers. Other forms of energy have been undercutting it since thermal steam rigs started working in North African farms. Probably longer when you consider the history of wind power. If Natural Gas wasn't so arduous to obtain, a carbon liberator, and damaging to the water table to obtain, I suspect we'd be more excited about it.
- JoeAltmaier 10y agoIf Methane Hydrates work out, then natural gas will be less arduous to obtain - port cities will have pipes coming up from the seafloor into the harbor, delivering it to their millions of residents.
- KirinDave 10y agoIt's true, but it'd be nice if we were using oceanic floor pressure to sequester carbon rather than liberate more, even if on the long balance it's carbon neutral. We really need to work out practices where we actively remove carbon from the air.