Case B: Human B has become a victim of discrimination and is therefore attributed to a group of people who are often treated equally bad (see: positive discrimi

Case B: Human B has become a victim of discrimination and is therefore attributed to a group of people who are often treated equally bad (see: positive discrimination). Human B is preferred when applying for a new position and in some other questions. This new special treatment pleases human B very much. Human B is now working with Human C. Human C has not enjoyed any special treatment because human C does not belong to the discriminated group of people. Human C works very very well. Human B works as well as before, but performs not as well in comparison to human C. Therefore, human B looks for a reason to sabotage the work of human C, and claims that human C is discriminatory and that human B is treated worse than others by human C because Human B belongs to the discriminated group of people. Human C is wrongly accused, but must bear the full consequences. Human C suffers and only the performance stagnates, but human C feels forced to quit. Human B performs exactly the same work as before, but now better in comparison. Human C has become the victim of victim mentality. (Problem: Is it possible to use those scenario to determine which gender human A,B and C are attributed to? Which gender are human A, B and C?)