3 ms·
An argument from personal incredulity is still a logical fallacy. It's easy to see why this line of reasoning doesn't make sense. If we're living in a simulati
by avar 10y ago
An argument from personal incredulity is still a logical fallacy. It's easy to see why this line of reasoning doesn't make sense.
If we're living in a simulation the thing most likely to running the simulation is ourselves, in the future.
It's easy to see why that would be valuable, e.g. this could be a simulation to see what happens if a war broke out in 1914, and all the downstream effects on that happening.
- ceejay 10y agoI think simulations will be used to help people live more productive / happy lives in the future. Imagine having many "lives" worth of experience, perhaps from many different periods throughout history, and you're still only 16 years old. Not just the "matrix" flavor where the goal is to learn specific skills. I'm talking about being born, growing old, and dying in a simulation many times in a matter of hours? / days? / weeks? and being able to recall those experiences / decisions and their rewards and/or consequences once you're back to living your "real" life.
- trailynx 10y agodo you know the series "Rick and Morty"? reminds me exactly of this part: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szzVlQ653as https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szzVlQ653as