3 ms·
A majority of software companies can operate on RDS (and DynamoDB for that matter) and utilize their built-in scaling functions. CockroachDB adds no value to th
by mbesto 10y ago
A majority of software companies can operate on RDS (and DynamoDB for that matter) and utilize their built-in scaling functions. CockroachDB adds no value to those customers, which will presumably make up the bulk of them hypothetically becoming a profitable company.
Contrast CockroachDB with some of the other nascent open-source-to-successful-businesses:
Influx - Solves timeseries applications challenges. (biz problem)
Citus - Solves a scale out technology problem with an already established DB platform. (tech problem)
Confluent - Solves scaling issues with an already established data streaming database. (tech problem)
Cloudera - Solves scaling issues with an already established big data platform. (tech problem)
Elastic - Solves search application challenges. (biz problem)
Cockroach - Solves scaling issues with SQL databases by offering an alternative DB. (??)
Unless Cockroach can position itself as either solving a technology challenge with an already adopted DB solution, or solves a business problem, it's going to be very difficult to achieve profitability.
- mbesto 10y agoI should add. One of the reason I thought that RethinkDB might actually survive was that (as far as I could tell) their database not only solve scaling issues, but also helped solve real-time push to mobile apps. I'm surprised they didn't position more to mobile app devs for adoption.
- pbarnes_1 10y agoWhen I tested RethinkDB, it was an order of magnitude slower than Postgres. That didn't match the website marketing, so I just gave up. Dunno what that anecdote adds, but... that was my experience.