4 ms·
To that end, it might be worth spelling out in the title here. I got my hopes up thinking it was about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communicating_sequential_pr
by wsh91 10y ago
To that end, it might be worth spelling out in the title here. I got my hopes up thinking it was about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communicating_sequential_processes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communicating_sequential_proce....
- sethammons 10y agoDitto
- ptoomey3 10y agoApologies for that not being clear. Given I had linked to the original article in the first sentence, I took the perspective of people knowing which "CSP" I was talking about. I'll update the post in the morning to spell/link out to the first CSP reference.
- skrebbel 10y agoIf you ever have a post-Communicating Sequential Processes journey at GitHub, please do write a post! Most people I know are moving to something CSP based (say, Go channels) so it would be very cool to understand why someone would consciously decide to ditch the concept again, after a serious engineering effort.
- ptoomey3 10y agoI've updated the post to spell out/link to a description of CSP upon first mention.
- ptoomey3 10y agoFunny enough, I tried doing exactly that when I submitted the post to HN this morning: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13437920 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13437920. But, unfortunately, my submission wasn't the one to make the front page .
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]