3 ms·
I would say that a "function pointer" isn't really a pointer: you can't dereference it or do arithmetic on it. Really, the things we currently call "functions"
by ScottBurson 10y ago
I would say that a "function pointer" isn't really a pointer: you can't dereference it or do arithmetic on it. Really, the things we currently call "functions" should be "function literals", and then what's now a "function pointer" could be just a "function".