3 ms·
Perhaps... If Japan hadn't had been the military ally of the people who perverted the symbol, I'd probably agree.
by LordKano 10y ago
Perhaps... If Japan hadn't had been the military ally of the people who perverted the symbol, I'd probably agree.
- mynameisvlad 10y agoYes, because the symbol hasn't been used for tens of thousands of years before the Nazis adopted it.
- nathanm412 10y agoIndia should be able to use it as much as they want. I would imagine it would be harder to make that case for a former Axis power.
- mynameisvlad 10y agoWhy? It's a religious symbol. Their use is completely (as in, totally, 100%) unrelated to WW2, and it was in use far before the war. So, with all that said why should their status in that war affect it at all?
- gkya 10y agoJapan is not a person. No people should be held responsible in its entirety for a mistake of the political organisation governing them. Even in most democracies, minorities get to decide on cases concerning the people in its entirety, and during the WWII, an absolute monarchy with religious powers was in effect in Japan.
- LordKano 10y agoMy parents were not yet born and my grandparents were grade school children when the US interned Japanese-Americans but their tax money was still used to compensate those people for the injustice done to them. You inherit everything, good and bad, from those who came before you. It's your choice of what to keep and what to drop.
- gkya 10y agoGiven the symbol is not inherited from Nazis, there is no heir and no heritage here. It's just a similarity here.
- mindslight 10y agoThis line of thinking is just basic collectivism.