5 ms·
In the case of Google Go was developed in part to take over some of workloads previously done in Python; a language that is comparably as easy to develop in, wi
by tankenmate 10y ago
In the case of Google Go was developed in part to take over some of workloads previously done in Python; a language that is comparably as easy to develop in, with better tools and better performance. I suspect this is why the comparisons keep popping up.
- scriptkiddy 10y ago>In the case of Google Go was developed in part to take over some of workloads previously done in Python; a language that is comparably as easy to develop in, with better tools and better performance. Go definitely performs better, buy I think it'd disingenuous to claim that Go has better tooling.
- sfifs 10y agoJust by being a statically typed language, Go does have far better tooling and indeed many languages seem to copy its tooling concepts. What Python does have is a far richer third party library base.
- scriptkiddy 10y ago>What Python does have is a far richer third party library base. I assumed this is what you were talking about. i.e. Ipython, Jupyter, pdb, etc.
- sfifs 10y agonumpy pandas scikit-learn beautiful soup libraries for geo, geometry, tags, parsers etc etc. Python has an enormous base of sophisticated third party libraries.