> In a dubious art just coming into its prime, this bogus story would be his masterpiece. New York Times clearly has no respect for its readership. Just comin

> In a dubious art just coming into its prime, this bogus story would be his masterpiece. New York Times clearly has no respect for its readership. Just coming to its prime? That very Pulitzer prize that they award to each other is named after one of the more famous practitioners of publishing fake stories to sway public opinion. This is not a new dubious art form. It is called propaganda. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_of_the_Spanish%E2%80%93American_War#Hearst_and_Pulitzer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_of_the_Spanish%E2%8...