the really annoying point of this, from my perspective, is that it's only when they're done that they're going to open source the code. if they'd keep their co

the really annoying point of this, from my perspective, is that it's only when they're done that they're going to open source the code. if they'd keep their code open throughout the process, then people can push them code and help them out, and then we'd end up with a product that the community could stand behind, and ensure that it is portable, and release it as a stand alone program with all the goodness that it needs -- firewall tunneling, being a cross platform easy to deploy app, being fast, whatever If you were to push a feature to them instead of donating 25$ to their 'project', we'd all be a lot better off, and much much closer to our goal, then buying a group of four undergrads from nyu a slice of pizza