4 ms·
Well, I can see the reason why. I just don't think they will pull this off. I'm thinking that for every profile, there will be a node(computer), so for instance
by phatbyte 16y ago
Well, I can see the reason why. I just don't think they will pull this off. I'm thinking that for every profile, there will be a node(computer), so for instance, if a computer is not connected, will it not be available for viewing that users photos,etc..
But, if they save all of the content (personal info, friends info, pictures...) locally like say a repository(GIT, SVN, etc..) wouldn't this miss the whole point of owning your data, since instead of my picture being in one server..it's living in all of my friends computers.
- johnrob 16y agoExactly, I don't think this project will get far trying to deliver privacy at the expense of redundancy/availability.
- phr 16y agoStore encrypted data redundantly in the cloud, with peer-to-peer crypto magic for key distribution? I have no idea how you'd protect against one of your "friends" deciding to release your stuff in plaintext.