3 ms·
> I tend to group languages into machine-code, VM, and interpreted. This distinction doesn't make much sense in 2017: most languages are blends of all these th
by hota_mazi 10y ago
> I tend to group languages into machine-code, VM, and interpreted.
This distinction doesn't make much sense in 2017: most languages are blends of all these things with technologies like VM's, JIT, Ahead-of-time compilation, etc...
- sdfsdufihwfuhdf 10y agoUnderneath they're still divisible. AoT is always native machine code. JIT/VM/Bytecode is VM, basically machine code on demand. Then there's interpreted code which has worked the same way for forever