3 ms·
No patch has been accepted (unless I mis-understood what you are saying). In fact, if it's not totally obvious to everyone that timf is the one that committed
by clemesha 16y ago
No patch has been accepted (unless I mis-understood what you are saying).
In fact, if it's not totally obvious to everyone that timf is the one that committed the latest commit, then this demonstration is noteworthy.
- wwortiz 16y agoI was simply stating that patches shouldn't be accepted just because a high profile person submitted it (which this could possible be used to spoof for malicious intent). As for the second part I was wondering if this had any other implications such as committing to someone else repo or if it is just masking identities with another users.