5 ms·
This probably should have been a reply underneath "akmittal"'s top-level comment, since I'm referring to two or three replies he received. His comment was one
by StevePerkins 10y ago
This probably should have been a reply underneath "akmittal"'s top-level comment, since I'm referring to two or three replies he received.
His comment was one of the first things posted. So at the time of MY comment, that was very much the tone of this thread.
The direction of the conversation has changed since then, which probably explains why my comment has gone from 15 upvotes to zero. However, it was clearly not bait at the time.
- paxcoder 10y agoUnder drinkjuice's reply to akmittal yes, that's the one comment I'm referring to. But one does not "so much" make.
- StevePerkins 10y agoSigh. [1] "'They' are not even 'they' anymore. At this point, Opera is pretty much just a brand name making a mockery of the former program." [2] "That the fork will outcompete current Blink-based Opera?" [3] "they would risk competitor using 1/4 memory, loading instantly, and with zero UI latency(load 40 tabs in anything Chromelike and then try fullscreening YT video- takes almost one second)." Again, at the time of my comment there were only 7 or 8 in the thread altogether. So... "so much", then. If you wish, you could quibble over whether these are sufficiently "salty". I don't care if our opinions differ. Regardless, you're implying that a positive counterpoint to negativity over Opera is out of place here, and that's nonsense.