3 ms·
In Rule 15, pg 10: "You should not discount the quality ranking learner for ranking spam highly"". Not sure if they are saying quality is an input to the spam
by mooneater 10y ago
In Rule 15, pg 10: "You should not discount the quality ranking learner for ranking spam highly"".
Not sure if they are saying quality is an input to the spam classifier?
- iaw 10y agoMy guess (I haven't had a chance to fully digest the paper) would be that they are saying spam is designed to emulate high quality signals so discounting it in the quality ranking could mute actual organic quality signals. Instead the approach they suggest (from my quick read) is to not include any information in the quality ranking system about spam but rather allow the spam classifier/filter to deal with it on it's own terms.